View source for L. Ku, Y. Liang, and H. Chen. Opinion extraction, summarization and tracking in news and blog corpora. In Proceedings of AAAI-2006

== Citation ==
Lun-Wei Ku, Yu-Ting Liang, Hsin-Hsi Chen: Opinion Extraction, Summarization and Tracking in News and Blog Corpora. AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs 2006: 100-107

== Online Version ==
[http://nlg18.csie.ntu.edu.tw:8080/opinion/SS0603KuLW.pdf paper]

== Summary == 

=== Abstract ===
Humans like to express their opinions and are eager to know
others’ opinions. Automatically mining and organizing
opinions from heterogeneous information sources are very
useful for individuals, organizations and even governments.
Opinion extraction, opinion summarization and opinion
tracking are three important techniques for understanding
opinions. Opinion extraction mines opinions at word,
sentence and document levels from articles. Opinion
summarization summarizes opinions of articles by telling
sentiment polarities, degree and the correlated events. In
this paper, both news and web blog articles are investigated.
TREC, NTCIR and articles collected from web blogs serve
as the information sources for opinion extraction.
Documents related to the issue of animal cloning are
selected as the experimental materials. Algorithms for
opinion extraction at word, sentence and document level are
proposed. The issue of relevant sentence selection is
discussed, and then topical and opinionated information are
summarized. Opinion summarizations are visualized by
representative sentences. Text-based summaries in different
languages, and from different sources, are compared.
Finally, an opinionated curve showing supportive and nonsupportive
degree along the timeline is illustrated by an
opinion tracking system.

=== Data ===
* TREC 2003 (Soboroff and Harman, 2003). 50 document sets of 2003 TREC novelty corpus, and each set
contains 25 documents. All documents in the same set are
relevant.
* NTCIR(Chen and Chen, 2001). The test collection
consists of 50 topics and 6 of them are opinionated topics.
Total 192 documents relevant to the six topics are chosen
as training data in this paper. Documents of an additional
topic “animal cloning” of NTCIR 3 are selected from
CIRB011 and CIRB020 document collections and used for
testing.
*Blog is a new rising community for expressing opinions.
To investigate the opinions expressed in blogs, we retrieve
documents from blog portals by the query “animal cloning”. There are 20 documents in total.

=== Annotation ===
Inter-annotator agreement was investigated in labeling the sentence and document as positive, neutral, negative and non-sentiment. They drop the instance that has huge variations among different coders.


=== Task ===
Opinion Extraction, Opinion Summarization, Opinion Tracking. Details will explained in the following sub-section

=== Opinion Extraction ===

====Method====
* Word Level: First collect sentiment words, and then enlarge with thesauri. It is a simple voting algorithm which deals with weight
* Sentence Level: Fusion of sentences and the sentiment words and opinion in the senescence.
* Document Level； Simple combination of every document.

====Performance====

The method is better than the machine learning algorithm(SVM,C5 decision tree). Because semantics within a word is not enough.

===Opinion Summarization===

Not only consider the sentiment of the sentence, but also take into consideration of whether this sentence is related to the topics as well. Only consider the sentence which is related to the topics in sentiment analysis.
====Algorithm ====
TF_IDF is used in identifying key words for certain topics. And in the end we choose the higher sentiment degree sentences as the opinion summary.

===Opinion Tracking===