Difference between revisions of "Paper-review assignments for this class"
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
writeup that made use of someone else's study plan, and would get some | writeup that made use of someone else's study plan, and would get some | ||
partial credit if someone else used one of your study plans. | partial credit if someone else used one of your study plans. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Give feedback on this idea === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Give us your feedback - will this work? Just add some text here. You can sign it with | ||
+ | --[[User:Wcohen|Wcohen]] 21:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Add another idea == | ||
+ | |||
+ | What sort of assigments would you design? Remember, the constraints are | ||
+ | * Students collectively create something useful | ||
+ | * Completing the project moves you toward understanding an area that you might do a project on. |
Revision as of 16:13, 10 September 2012
William's Idea
One idea is for students write up K reviews of a recent paper (say last two years) related to ASM. The format review would be like a conference paper review - summary, strengths and weaknesses and possible impact - and a recommendation for whether or not to assign the paper as required/optional reading in later classes. The reviews would not be published to the class.
For each paper reviewed, we'd set up a class-accessible wiki page where users would record a "study plan" - what background materiel they needed to read, or would recommend for others. I'm thinking we'd keep this simple, as an indented list with links and annotation, but use structured links to link it to a page for the paper reviewed, so you could find it. For instance a "study plan" might be:
Study plan for user:wcohen's review of Pang et al, ACL 2003:
- I read Turney, ACL 2002 for background, since the paper discusses this for motivation.
- I read the wikipedia page for SVMs for background.
- * I read about what a linear kernel is to help understand the SVM page.
The constraint would be: only include things that were useful as 'prerequisites', use an indented list to indicate the dependencies, and have only one link per line. You'd be encouraged to link to pages in the class wiki or wikipedia if you can, otherwise to an ACM DL or ACL DL link, otherwise to anything. We could extract some maybe-useful data from this - or at least, get an idea if students find it useful to have such data.
The goal would be to make it easier for later students to do reviews. To encourage this, you would get some sort of partial credit for a writeup that made use of someone else's study plan, and would get some partial credit if someone else used one of your study plans.
Give feedback on this idea
Give us your feedback - will this work? Just add some text here. You can sign it with
--Wcohen 21:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Add another idea
What sort of assigments would you design? Remember, the constraints are
- Students collectively create something useful
- Completing the project moves you toward understanding an area that you might do a project on.