Difference between revisions of "BinLu et al. ACL2011"
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
- Can AD detect injected anomalies? | - Can AD detect injected anomalies? | ||
- How much time these methods take to run on graphs of varying sizes? | - How much time these methods take to run on graphs of varying sizes? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Discussion == | ||
+ | This paper poses two important social problems related to bipartite social graphs and explained how those problems can be solved efficiently using random walks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | They also claim that the neighborhoods over nodes can represent personalized clusters depending on different perspectives. | ||
+ | |||
+ | During presentation one of the audiences raised question about is anomaly detection in this paper similar to betweenness of edges defined in Kleinber's text as discussed in [[Class Meeting for 10-802 01/26/2010]]. I think they are similar. In the texbook they propose, detecting edges with high betweenness and using them to partition the graph. In this paper they first try to create neighbourhood partitions based on random walk prbabilities and which as a by product gives us nodes and edges with high betweenness value. |
Revision as of 17:51, 26 September 2012
Citation
Joint Bilinguial Sentiment Classification with Unlabeled Parallel Corpora, Bin Lu, Chenhao Tan, Claire Cardie and Benjamin K. Tsou, ACL 2011
Online version
Joint Bilingual Sentiment Classification with Unlabeled Parallel Corpora
Summary
This paper poses two interesting social problems on abcd named problem1 and problem2. They also propose solutions based on method1 and method2.
The experimented on 3 real world social graphs dataset1, dataset2 and dataset3
Evaluation
They evaluate their methods by asking following 4 questions :
- Does NF find out meaningful neighborhoods? - How close is Approximate NF to exact NF? - Can AD detect injected anomalies? - How much time these methods take to run on graphs of varying sizes?
Discussion
This paper poses two important social problems related to bipartite social graphs and explained how those problems can be solved efficiently using random walks.
They also claim that the neighborhoods over nodes can represent personalized clusters depending on different perspectives.
During presentation one of the audiences raised question about is anomaly detection in this paper similar to betweenness of edges defined in Kleinber's text as discussed in Class Meeting for 10-802 01/26/2010. I think they are similar. In the texbook they propose, detecting edges with high betweenness and using them to partition the graph. In this paper they first try to create neighbourhood partitions based on random walk prbabilities and which as a by product gives us nodes and edges with high betweenness value.