Difference between revisions of "Yano et al NAACL 2009"
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
The authors have released the [[UsesDataset::Yano & Smith blog dataset|Yano & Smith blog dataset]], which was used for this evaluation. | The authors have released the [[UsesDataset::Yano & Smith blog dataset|Yano & Smith blog dataset]], which was used for this evaluation. | ||
− | This dataset contains the following 5 sites: [http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/ CarpetBagger] (CB), [http://www.dailykos.com/ Daily Kos] (DK), [http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com Matthew Yglesias] (MY), [http://www.redstate.com/ Red State] (RS), and [http://www.rightwingnews.com/ Right Wing News] (RWN). | + | This dataset contains post and comments from the following 5 sites: [http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/ CarpetBagger] (CB), [http://www.dailykos.com/ Daily Kos] (DK), [http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com Matthew Yglesias] (MY), [http://www.redstate.com/ Red State] (RS), and [http://www.rightwingnews.com/ Right Wing News] (RWN). |
Revision as of 19:04, 26 September 2012
Contents
Citation
Tae Yano, William Cohen, and Noah A. Smith. Predicting Response to Political Blog Posts with Topic Models. In Proc of NAACL 2009.
Online Version
Predicting Response to Political Blog Posts with Topic Models.
Summary
This Paper describes a topic model based approach in modeling the generation of blog text (posts and comments).
Brief description of the method
This paper expands upon LinkLDA, presented in Erosheva et al. (2004).
Here, is a distribution over topics, is a multinomial distribution over post words, and is a multinomial distribution over (comment) users. and are the words counts in the post and all of its comments, respectively.
Although LinkLDA can model which users are likely to respond to a post, it does not model the comment text they will write.
The authors expand on this by proposing CommentLDA, as shown below.
In CommentLDA, note that the comment text is modeled by the distribution over comment words given topics, .
The authors provide three different variations on how to count the comments (counting by verbosity, response, or comments).
Experimental Result
Task: given a training dataset consisting of a collection of blog posts and their commenters and comments, and an unseen test dataset from a later time period, predict who is going to comment on a new blog post from the test set. The evaluation is done using precision (macro-averaged across posts) of predictions at various cut-offs () .
The authors have released the Yano & Smith blog dataset, which was used for this evaluation. This dataset contains post and comments from the following 5 sites: CarpetBagger (CB), Daily Kos (DK), Matthew Yglesias (MY), Red State (RS), and Right Wing News (RWN).
The compared models were:
- Baseline: post-independent prediction that ranks users by their comment frequency
- Naive Bayes: with word counts in the post's main entry as features
- LinkLDA: 3 variations (verbosity, response, comments)
- CommentLDA: 3 variations (verbosity, response, comments)
Results:
- Some improvement over both the baseline and Naive Bayes for 3 out of the 5 sites
- LinkLDA usually works slightly better than CommentLDA
- Varying the counting method can bring as much as 10% performance gain
- Results suggest that commenters on different sites behave differently
Discussion
While the proposed method (CommentLDA) achieves mixed results on the prediction task, it provides a way to understand and summarize the data.
Related Papers
Study Plan
Papers/articles/blogs/videos you may want to read to understand this paper.
- David Blei, Anrew Ng, Michael Jordan, "Latent Dirichlet Allocation" JMLR, vol.3, pp.993-1022 (2003) pdf