Difference between revisions of "Result of AD using small-world"
From Cohen Courses
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with 'In this paper, the authors varied the threshold T from 0.010 to 0.050. The figure A shows the cluster coefficient of AD patients is lower than control patients. But the differenc…') |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In this paper, the authors varied the threshold T from 0.010 to 0.050. The figure A shows the cluster coefficient of AD patients is lower than control patients. But the difference is not so obvious when T is low. In figure B, we can see that path length L does show clear differences between these two groups of patients. In the intermediate range of T, the AD patients have a significant larger path length. | + | In this paper, the authors varied the threshold T from 0.010 to 0.050. The figure A shows the cluster coefficient of AD patients is lower than control patients(SC). But the difference is not so obvious when T is low. In figure B, we can see that path length L does show clear differences between these two groups of patients. In the intermediate range of T, the AD patients have a significant larger path length. |
| + | |||
| + | [[File:AD_PATIENT.png]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:18, 29 March 2011
In this paper, the authors varied the threshold T from 0.010 to 0.050. The figure A shows the cluster coefficient of AD patients is lower than control patients(SC). But the difference is not so obvious when T is low. In figure B, we can see that path length L does show clear differences between these two groups of patients. In the intermediate range of T, the AD patients have a significant larger path length.
