Difference between revisions of "Support Vector Machines"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
: <math>y_i(\mathbf{w}\cdot\mathbf{x_i} - b) \ge 1. \, </math> | : <math>y_i(\mathbf{w}\cdot\mathbf{x_i} - b) \ge 1. \, </math> | ||
− | We can substitute ||'''w'''|| with <math>\tfrac{1}{2}\|\mathbf{w}\|^2</math> without changing the solution. This now becomes a quadratic programming problem. | + | We can substitute ||'''w'''|| with <math>\tfrac{1}{2}\|\mathbf{w}\|^2</math> without changing the solution. This now becomes a quadratic programming problem. Some of this math is obtained from Wikipedia, refer to the corresponding Wikipedia article for more details. |
== Training == | == Training == | ||
− | There exist several specialized algorithms for quickly solving the Quadratic Programming problem that arises from SVMs, mostly reliant on heuristics for breaking the problem down into smaller, more-manageable chunks. A common method is | + | There exist several specialized algorithms for quickly solving the Quadratic Programming problem that arises from SVMs, mostly reliant on heuristics for breaking the problem down into smaller, more-manageable chunks. A common method is the Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO) algorithm, which breaks the problem down into 2-dimensional sub-problems that can be solved analytically and runs in cubic time. |
== Advantages == | == Advantages == |
Latest revision as of 22:25, 31 March 2011
This is a machine learning model.
Summary
Support Vector Machines are supervised models that take positive and negative instances of classes in some feature space as training instances, and learn a linear decision boundary between the two classes. Unlike probability based methods such as logistic regression that attempt to learn a hyperplane that maximizes the likelihood of the training data, SVMs rely on margin and learn hyperplanes that maximize the distance separation between positive and negative instances. For cases where the training data isn't perfectly separable, they make use of slack variables.
Formal Description
We are given some training data , a set of n points of the form
where the yi is either 1 or −1, indicating the class to which the point belongs. Each is a p-dimensional real vector. We want to find the maximum-margin hyperplane that divides the points having from those having .
We want to choose the and to maximize the margin, or distance between the parallel hyperplanes that are as far apart as possible while still separating the data, i.e.
Minimize (in )
subject to (for any )
We can substitute ||w|| with without changing the solution. This now becomes a quadratic programming problem. Some of this math is obtained from Wikipedia, refer to the corresponding Wikipedia article for more details.
Training
There exist several specialized algorithms for quickly solving the Quadratic Programming problem that arises from SVMs, mostly reliant on heuristics for breaking the problem down into smaller, more-manageable chunks. A common method is the Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO) algorithm, which breaks the problem down into 2-dimensional sub-problems that can be solved analytically and runs in cubic time.
Advantages
- They are more robust to overfitting, since the final model relies only on support vectors, as opposed to all the instances of the training set.
- The use of the Kernel trick allows us to efficiently use custom kernels for any given task
- They can easily handle very high dimensional data
Applications
They are applicable for a variety of binary as well as multiclass classification problems such as text classification, and have recently also been applied for regression problems.