Difference between revisions of "Zhou et al ACM symposium on Applied Computing 2006"
PastStudents (talk | contribs) |
PastStudents (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The [[Category::paper]] presents a MEDical Information Extraction (MedIE) system, which extracts patient information from free-text clinical records. | The [[Category::paper]] presents a MEDical Information Extraction (MedIE) system, which extracts patient information from free-text clinical records. | ||
− | They divided their extraction job into three | + | They divided their extraction job into three tasks below. |
* extraction of medical terms | * extraction of medical terms | ||
− | * relation extraction | + | * [[AddressesProblem::relation extraction]] |
** extraction of associated medical concepts | ** extraction of associated medical concepts | ||
** e.g. Blood pressure & 144/90 in the sentence, "Blood pressure is 144/90" | ** e.g. Blood pressure & 144/90 in the sentence, "Blood pressure is 144/90" | ||
− | * text classification | + | * [[AddressesProblem::text classification]] |
** e.g. a patient can be classified as a former smoker, a current smoker, or a non-smoker | ** e.g. a patient can be classified as a former smoker, a current smoker, or a non-smoker | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 9 October 2010
Citation
Ciaohua Zhou et al. 2006. Approaches to Text Mining for Clinical Medical Records. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing, 235-239.
Online version
Summary
The paper presents a MEDical Information Extraction (MedIE) system, which extracts patient information from free-text clinical records.
They divided their extraction job into three tasks below.
- extraction of medical terms
- relation extraction
- extraction of associated medical concepts
- e.g. Blood pressure & 144/90 in the sentence, "Blood pressure is 144/90"
- text classification
- e.g. a patient can be classified as a former smoker, a current smoker, or a non-smoker
Their approaches are:
- An ontology-based approach for extracting medical terms of interest
- they used Unified Medical Language System (UMLS)
- About terms that are not defined in UMLS, they predicted categories of some terms using sentence structures.
- A graph-based approach which uses the parsing result of link-grammar parser for relation-extraction
- They included the processing of negation.
- When the parser fails, they used a pattern-based approach.
- Because the parser did not process multi-word terms, they replaced the terms with placeholders.
- an NLP-based feature extraction method coupled with an ID3-based decision tree for text classification
This approach was fairly successful mostly showing over 80% of precision and recall. However, the system was tested on the data written by only a clinician, which means that the style of free-text records was consistent. Nevertheless, the research is worth in that they applied various IE techniques to the free-text clinical records, explain about the problems they encountered.
Related papers
An interesting follow-up paper is Denecke and Bernauer AIME 2007 which uses semantic structures to extract medical information.