Difference between revisions of "Expectation Regularization"
PastStudents (talk | contribs) |
PastStudents (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
− | We want to minimize the distance between <math> \tilde{p} </math> and <math> \hat{p} </math>. | + | We want to minimize the distance between <math> \tilde{p} </math> and <math> \hat{p} </math>, denoted as <math>\triangle(\hat{p},\tilde{p})</math>. |
KL-distance is used here so the regularization becomes | KL-distance is used here so the regularization becomes | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 30 November 2010
This is a method introduced in G.S Mann and A. McCallum, ICML 2007. It is often served as a regularized term with the likelihood function. In practice human often have an insight of label prior distribution. This method introduced a way to take advantage of this prior knowledge.
Let's denote human-provided prior as and empirical label distribution as . The empirical label distribution is computed over unlabeled data set ,
We want to minimize the distance between and , denoted as . KL-distance is used here so the regularization becomes
For semi-supervised learning purposes, we can augment the objective function by adding regularization term. For example, the new conditional likelihood of data becomes
Note that this is a global regularizer instead of a local one, in which case it would assign all instances to the majority of the class.