Difference between revisions of "Link Prediction in Relational Data"
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Relational Markov Network== | ==Relational Markov Network== | ||
<math>G = (V, E)</math> be an undirected graph with a set of cliques <math>C(G)</math>. Each <math>c \in C(G)</math> is associated with a set of nodes <math>V_c</math> and a clique potential <math>\phi_c(V_C)</math>, which is a non-negative function defined on the joint domain of <math>V_c</math>. The Markov net defines the distribution <math>P(v)=\frac{1}{z}\Pi_{c\in C(G)}{\phi_c(v_c)}</math> | <math>G = (V, E)</math> be an undirected graph with a set of cliques <math>C(G)</math>. Each <math>c \in C(G)</math> is associated with a set of nodes <math>V_c</math> and a clique potential <math>\phi_c(V_C)</math>, which is a non-negative function defined on the joint domain of <math>V_c</math>. The Markov net defines the distribution <math>P(v)=\frac{1}{z}\Pi_{c\in C(G)}{\phi_c(v_c)}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | To extend it to a relational setting, a relational Markov Network specifies a conditional distribution over all of the labels of all of the entities in an instantiation given the relational structure and the content attributes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | To specify what cliques should be constructed in an instantiation, | ||
+ | we will de�ne a notion of a relational clique | ||
+ | template. A relational clique template speci�es tuples of | ||
+ | variables in the instantiation by using a relational query language. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For more details, please refer to [[[paper:]] | ||
== Study Plan == | == Study Plan == |
Revision as of 04:34, 4 October 2012
Link Prediction in Relational Data
Contents
Citation
Ben Taskar and Ming-fai Wong and Pieter Abbeel and Daphne Koller, Link prediction in relational data, NIPS 2003
Online version
Summary
This paper focuses on Link Prediction and develops a framework which supports multiple link types and both link features and node features. The key idea is to use relational Markov network and to define the probabilistic patterns over subgraph structures for each application data sets to capture some type of feature.
Problem and Intuition
The problem is not exactly the traditional relationship prediction or recommendation over social network, but in a broader sense. Given some data in a relational format, say hyper-linked university web pages, the task can be to find who is whose adviser. This is compatible with the traditional link prediction problem, as every node feature can be mapped into a relational format. To predict whether a link exist, the information of both the two nodes and the link is not enough. For example, the fact that a professor and a student often show up in the same research project pages is a strong indicator. And this paper tries to use a subgraph structure to capture these kind of graph features in a relational Markov Network framework.
Relational Markov Network
be an undirected graph with a set of cliques . Each is associated with a set of nodes and a clique potential , which is a non-negative function defined on the joint domain of . The Markov net defines the distribution
To extend it to a relational setting, a relational Markov Network specifies a conditional distribution over all of the labels of all of the entities in an instantiation given the relational structure and the content attributes.
To specify what cliques should be constructed in an instantiation, we will de�ne a notion of a relational clique template. A relational clique template speci�es tuples of variables in the instantiation by using a relational query language.
For more details, please refer to [[[paper:]]