Difference between revisions of "Comparing Unsupervised Learning of Narrative Event Chains and Mining the web for fine-grained semantic verb relations"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Paper 2 uses approach motivated by mutual information to compute strength of association/relation between verb pairs and surface pattern. Paper 1 uses mutual information motivated approach to induce narrative events. It uses [[UsesMethod::Support Vector Machines]] for temporal ordering of connected events. | Paper 2 uses approach motivated by mutual information to compute strength of association/relation between verb pairs and surface pattern. Paper 1 uses mutual information motivated approach to induce narrative events. It uses [[UsesMethod::Support Vector Machines]] for temporal ordering of connected events. | ||
| − | Paper 1 uses a [[UsesDataset::Gigaword corpus]]. Whereas, in Paper 2 Google is used to find number of hits for relation verb pair <math> V1,V2 </math> and surface pattern <math> P </math> from WWW. | + | Paper 1 uses a [[UsesDataset::Gigaword corpus]] for training. Whereas, in Paper 2 Google is used to find number of hits for relation verb pair <math> V1,V2 </math> and surface pattern <math> P </math> from WWW. |
Revision as of 05:54, 6 November 2012
Papers
1. Unsupervised Learning of Narrative Event Chains, by N. Chambers, D. Jurafsky. [1]
2. VerbOcean:Mining the Web for Fine-Grained Semantic Verb Relations, by T. Chklovski, P. Pantel. [2]
Problem, method and dataset
Goal of first paper was to extract narrative event chains using unsupervised methods . Whereas, goal of second paper is to find the relation between verbs. Relations considered in second paper are similarity, strength, antonymy, enablement, and temporal relations.
Paper 2 uses approach motivated by mutual information to compute strength of association/relation between verb pairs and surface pattern. Paper 1 uses mutual information motivated approach to induce narrative events. It uses Support Vector Machines for temporal ordering of connected events.
Paper 1 uses a Gigaword corpus for training. Whereas, in Paper 2 Google is used to find number of hits for relation verb pair and surface pattern from WWW.
Additional Questions
1. How much time did you spend reading the (new, non-wikified) paper you summarized? 2 hour
2. How much time did you spend reading the old wikified paper? 1 hours
3. How much time did you spend reading the summary of the old paper? 10-15 minutes
4. How much time did you spend reading background materiel? Not Much.
5. Was there a study plan for the old paper? No.
