Goelbeck 2012 CHI
From Cohen Courses
Revision as of 14:38, 20 September 2012 by Apappu (talk | contribs) (Created page with '== Citation == This is a review of reviewed paper::Goelbeck 2012 CHI The Twitter Mute Button: A Web Filtering Challenge. == Online == * [http://dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?…')
Contents
Citation
This is a review of Goelbeck 2012 CHI The Twitter Mute Button: A Web Filtering Challenge.
Online
Clarity of Writing
- 5
Completeness
- 3
- This works presents a nascent approach to solve the topic specific filtering of tweets. Bag of words with some additional heuristics were used to filter tweets about three hand-picked topics.
Originality
- 3
- The problem is quite interesting and can be a useful tool for people to mute/unmute tweets on a topic. However, the approach and experimentation is quite limited.
Experimental Work
- 2
- The experimental work is quite anecdotal. The test set is too small to justify that this approach can be used to catch tweets about various topics. Especially, with text-normalization challenges in the ill-behaved text like tweets.
Overall Recommendation
- 3
- Ultimately, your job as a reviewer is to provide a recommendation to the senior program committee (SPC) as to whether or not the paper should be accepted for presentation in the conference. If all of the reviewers give the same recommendation, the SPC will probably go along with it. If there is disagreement, the SPC member might ask you to clarify your comments to try to come up with well reasoned decision. (1=reject, 2=lean to reject, 3=could go either way, 4=lean to accept, 5=accept.)
