Difference between revisions of "Compare Measuring User Influence in Twitter and Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation"

From Cohen Courses
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
# [[Influentials,_Networks,_and_Public_Opinion_Formation]], Watts, Duncan J., and Peter Sheridan Dodds. Journal of consumer research 34.4 (2007): 441-458.
 
# [[Influentials,_Networks,_and_Public_Opinion_Formation]], Watts, Duncan J., and Peter Sheridan Dodds. Journal of consumer research 34.4 (2007): 441-458.
  
 +
== Problem ==
  
method
+
== Big idea ==
dataset used
+
 
problem
+
== Dataset ==
big idea
+
 
other
+
 
 +
== Method ==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Additional Questions ==
 +
* How much time did you spend reading the (new, non-wikified) paper you summarized? 3.5 hour.
 +
* How much time did you spend reading the old wikified paper? 30 minutes.
 +
* How much time did you spend reading the summary of the old paper? 15 minutes
 +
* How much time did you spend reading background materiel? 30 minutes
 +
* Was there a study plan for the old paper? No

Revision as of 23:45, 5 November 2012

Two Papers

  1. Measuring_User_Influence_in_Twitter:_The_Million_Follower_Fallacy, Cha, M. and Haddadi, H. and Benevenuto, F. and Gummadi, K.P., ICWSM 2010
  2. Influentials,_Networks,_and_Public_Opinion_Formation, Watts, Duncan J., and Peter Sheridan Dodds. Journal of consumer research 34.4 (2007): 441-458.

Problem

Big idea

Dataset

Method

Additional Questions

  • How much time did you spend reading the (new, non-wikified) paper you summarized? 3.5 hour.
  • How much time did you spend reading the old wikified paper? 30 minutes.
  • How much time did you spend reading the summary of the old paper? 15 minutes
  • How much time did you spend reading background materiel? 30 minutes
  • Was there a study plan for the old paper? No