Difference between revisions of "Compare Y. Borghol et al. 2011 and The Untold Story of the Clones: Content-agnostic Factors that Impact YouTube Video Popularity"

From Cohen Courses
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Papers ==
 
== Papers ==
 
1. [[Y. Borghol et al. Performance Evaluation 68 2011|Characterizing and modelling popularity of user-generated videos, Y. Borghol et al., Performance Evaluation 68 2011]]
 
1. [[Y. Borghol et al. Performance Evaluation 68 2011|Characterizing and modelling popularity of user-generated videos, Y. Borghol et al., Performance Evaluation 68 2011]]
 +
 
2. [[The Untold Story of the Clones: Content-agnostic Factors that Impact YouTube Video Popularity|The Untold Story of the Clones: Content-agnostic Factors that Impact YouTube Video Popularity, Y Borghol et al., KDD, 2012]].
 
2. [[The Untold Story of the Clones: Content-agnostic Factors that Impact YouTube Video Popularity|The Untold Story of the Clones: Content-agnostic Factors that Impact YouTube Video Popularity, Y Borghol et al., KDD, 2012]].
 +
 +
== Problem ==
 +
Although both papers study the popularity dynamics of user-generated videos, the focus is quite different. Paper 1 tries to characterize the evolution of YouTube video popularity in a general sense, while Paper 2 focuses on the content-agnostic factors only, and deliberately removes the impact that might be caused by video content. In paper 1, a three-phase evolution model is proposed to explain the popularity dynamics, while paper 2 does not have such characterization.
 +
 +
== Dataset==
 +
Paper 1 uses a
  
 
==Problem==
 
==Problem==

Revision as of 12:59, 5 November 2012

Papers

1. Characterizing and modelling popularity of user-generated videos, Y. Borghol et al., Performance Evaluation 68 2011

2. The Untold Story of the Clones: Content-agnostic Factors that Impact YouTube Video Popularity, Y Borghol et al., KDD, 2012.

Problem

Although both papers study the popularity dynamics of user-generated videos, the focus is quite different. Paper 1 tries to characterize the evolution of YouTube video popularity in a general sense, while Paper 2 focuses on the content-agnostic factors only, and deliberately removes the impact that might be caused by video content. In paper 1, a three-phase evolution model is proposed to explain the popularity dynamics, while paper 2 does not have such characterization.

Dataset

Paper 1 uses a

Problem

Retrieved from "http://curtis.ml.cmu.edu/w/courses/index.php?title=Compare_Y._Borghol_et_al._2011_and_The_Untold_Story_of_the_Clones:_Content-agnostic_Factors_that_Impact_YouTube_Video_Popularity&oldid=14948"