Difference between revisions of "Compare Yano et al NAACL 2009 Link PLSA LDA"

From Cohen Courses
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
== Comparison ==
 
== Comparison ==
  
 +
* method
 +
* dataset used
 +
* problem
 +
* big idea
 +
* other
  
 
== Questions ==
 
== Questions ==

Revision as of 17:35, 30 November 2012

Papers

The papers are:

Comparison

  • method
  • dataset used
  • problem
  • big idea
  • other

Questions

  1. How much time did you spend reading the (new, non-wikified) paper you summarized? About 2 hours
  2. How much time did you spend reading the old wikified paper? About 2 hours
  3. How much time did you spend reading the summary of the old paper? About 15 min
  4. How much time did you spend reading background material? N/A My final project for the class is on this area so I've read a lot of background papers
  5. Was there a study plan for the old paper? Yes
    1. if so, did you read any of the items suggested by the study plan? and how much time did you spend with reading them? I had actually read the papers before as it is directly related to my research with my advisor. I do a lot of Gibbs Sampling on graphical models (in particular topic-model derivatives) and that fits into the study plan
  6. Give us any additional feedback you might have about this assignment. I like this comparison. It was a nice way to view the papers in a different light and really made it stick in my memory. In general, I like the wikifying and used it extensively for the project (and probably will use this for my research in the future after the class is over).