Comparison Mrinmaya et. al. WWW2012 and McCallum et al 2004
From Cohen Courses
Revision as of 00:16, 6 November 2012 by Norii (talk | contribs) (Created page with '== Papers == The papers are * Mrinmaya et. al. WWW'12 * [[The Author-Recipient-Topic Model for Topic and Role Discovery in Social Networks: Experiments with Enron and Academ…')
Papers
The papers are
- Mrinmaya et. al. WWW'12
- The Author-Recipient-Topic Model for Topic and Role Discovery in Social Networks: Experiments with Enron and Academic Email
Comparison
In essence, the two papers are similar in the sense that ... The role that McCallum is referring to in the RART model can be thought of as Mrinmaya's community.
Questions
- How much time did you spend reading the (new, non-wikified) paper you summarized? About 1 hour
- How much time did you spend reading the old wikified paper? About 2 hours
- How much time did you spend reading the summary of the old paper? About 5 min
- How much time did you spend reading background material? About 30 min
- Was there a study plan for the old paper? Yes
- if so, did you read any of the items suggested by the study plan? and how much time did you spend with reading them? The first 2 were papers I have read in the past. I did a quick read (mainly on introduction) on Airoldis' Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodel paper, which took me about 30 minutes.
- Give us any additional feedback you might have about this assignment. '
