Difference between revisions of "Dietterich 2008 gradient tree boosting for training conditional random fields"

From Cohen Courses
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
The paper addresses the problem of combinatorial explosion of parameters of CRFs when new features are introduced. It represents the potential functions as sums of regression trees. The authors claim that adding a regression tree is a big step in the feature space and hence it reduces the number of iterations. This leads to a significant performance improvement.  
 
The paper addresses the problem of combinatorial explosion of parameters of CRFs when new features are introduced. It represents the potential functions as sums of regression trees. The authors claim that adding a regression tree is a big step in the feature space and hence it reduces the number of iterations. This leads to a significant performance improvement.  
 +
 +
== Method ==
 +
=== Functional Gradient Descent ===
 +
In a traditional gradient descent method, a function <math>\Psi</math> is represented by linear function of parameters. Thus, the parameter values after <math> m </math> steps  would be <math> \Theta_m = \Theta_0 + \delta_1 + \cdots + \delta_m </math>. Instead of parameterizing, functional gradient ascent assumes that <math>\Psi</math> is a weighted sum of functions; <math>\Psi_m = \Psi_0 + \Delta_1 + \cdots + \Delta_m</math>.
 +
  
 
== Reviews of this paper ==
 
== Reviews of this paper ==
 
{{#ask: [[reviewed paper::dietterich_2008_gradient_tree_boosting_for_training_conditional_random_fields]] | ?reviewer}}
 
{{#ask: [[reviewed paper::dietterich_2008_gradient_tree_boosting_for_training_conditional_random_fields]] | ?reviewer}}

Revision as of 20:11, 30 September 2011

Citation

Gradient Tree Boosting for Training Conditional Random Fields. By T. G Dietterich, G. Hao, A. Ashenfelter. In Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 9 ({{{issue}}}), 2008.

Online Version

This Paper is available online [1].

Summary

The paper addresses the problem of combinatorial explosion of parameters of CRFs when new features are introduced. It represents the potential functions as sums of regression trees. The authors claim that adding a regression tree is a big step in the feature space and hence it reduces the number of iterations. This leads to a significant performance improvement.

Method

Functional Gradient Descent

In a traditional gradient descent method, a function is represented by linear function of parameters. Thus, the parameter values after steps would be . Instead of parameterizing, functional gradient ascent assumes that is a weighted sum of functions; .


Reviews of this paper