Difference between revisions of "E.A. Leicht, Structure of Time Evo citation networks 2007"

From Cohen Courses
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
== '''Brief Description of Three Analysis Methods''' ==
 
== '''Brief Description of Three Analysis Methods''' ==
 
* A mixture model of citation process makes use of [[expectation-maximization algorithm]].  
 
* A mixture model of citation process makes use of [[expectation-maximization algorithm]].  
 +
This method divides vertices into groups which have similar time profiles to their citations
 
Suppose there are '''''n''''' vertices representing documents in a network, it can be divided into '''''c''''' groups. Then a log-likelihood function is given, by maximizing this function, a best estimate of the most likely values of the model parameters can be calculated. This process involves two steps:
 
Suppose there are '''''n''''' vertices representing documents in a network, it can be divided into '''''c''''' groups. Then a log-likelihood function is given, by maximizing this function, a best estimate of the most likely values of the model parameters can be calculated. This process involves two steps:
 
1.estimate the group member probabilities;  
 
1.estimate the group member probabilities;  
Line 20: Line 21:
  
  
*
+
* A clustering method in citation network.
 +
This method is a community analysis groups vertices which is linked to one another by edges.
 +
The method make use a method proposed by Newman based on the maximization of the benefit function known as [[“modularity”]]
 +
 
  
 
*
 
*
  
 
== '''Related Papers''' ==
 
== '''Related Papers''' ==

Revision as of 03:03, 4 February 2011

Citation

E.A. Leicht, G. Clarkson, K. Shedden, and M.E.J. Newman.2007. Large-scale structure of time evolving citation networks.In European Physical Journal B.-Volume 59, P75–83.


Online Version

Structure of Time Evolving Citation Networks


Summary

This paper uses three methods to examine the structure of large-scale networks (focus in particular on citation networks//link needed) that evolve over time. This paper demonstrates how each of these methods can divide the structure of large-scale network. A network of citations between opinions of the United States Supreme Court is used as an example in this paper.


Brief Description of Three Analysis Methods

This method divides vertices into groups which have similar time profiles to their citations Suppose there are n vertices representing documents in a network, it can be divided into c groups. Then a log-likelihood function is given, by maximizing this function, a best estimate of the most likely values of the model parameters can be calculated. This process involves two steps: 1.estimate the group member probabilities; 2. use the obtained probabilities to maximize the log-likelihood function. Through a few steps mathematical inference and proof, this paper reaches its conclusion the division process by using this model is self-consistent. Some examples are also given as a demonstration of this method.


  • A clustering method in citation network.

This method is a community analysis groups vertices which is linked to one another by edges. The method make use a method proposed by Newman based on the maximization of the benefit function known as “modularity”


Related Papers