Difference between revisions of "Mark my words!"

From Cohen Courses
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==summary ==
 
==summary ==
Physiological studies have suggested that participants in conversation accommodate in dimensions such as style, utterance length, gesture, speaking rate etc. In this paper authors investigate accommodation in twitter. They propose a novel probabilistic framework to compute measures such as stylistic cohesion,stylistic accommodation and stylistic influence and symmetry.
+
Physiological studies have suggested that participants in conversation accommodate in dimensions such as speaking style, utterance length, gesture, speaking rate etc. In this paper authors proves the hypothesis that linguistic  accommodation could also be seen in social media such as Twitter. They investigate accommodation in LIWC dimensions[http://www.liwc.net/liwcdescription.php].Some of examples for these dimensions include use of Article,Negation words(not/no),Preposition,Quantifier,1st person singular pronoun,1st person plural pronoun,2nd person pronoun in conversation. Authors propose a novel probabilistic framework to prove their hypothesis.
  
Authors use non-topical LIWC[link] dimensions to compute measures mentioned above. Some of examples for these dimensions include use of Article,Negation words(not/no),Preposition,Quantifier,1st person singular pronoun,1st person plural pronoun,2nd person pronoun in conversation.
+
Framework:
 +
 
 +
When individual talk about some topic, they would have to use similar words to describe topics hence it is important to remove topic accommodation from overall accommodation measure. Since they LIWC dimensions, it is automatically removed.
 +
 
 +
Their framework is based on mainly two components, stylistic cohesion and stylistic accommodation.
 +
 
 +
Stylstic Cohesion: It is used to find if tweets belonging to same conversation exhibit a certain LIWC style more than tweets which are unrelated. If the former is more then we can say that tweets which are part of same conversation agree more on a particular style. Formally, for a style <math> C </math> it is defined as:
 +
 +
<math>Coh(C) =P(T^C \wedge  R^C | T \leftrightarrow  R)-P(T^C \wedge  R^C)</math>
 +
 
 +
where <math> T \leftrightarrow  R </math> is condition which represent that tweets represent a conversation turn.

Revision as of 01:21, 2 October 2012

summary

Physiological studies have suggested that participants in conversation accommodate in dimensions such as speaking style, utterance length, gesture, speaking rate etc. In this paper authors proves the hypothesis that linguistic accommodation could also be seen in social media such as Twitter. They investigate accommodation in LIWC dimensions[1].Some of examples for these dimensions include use of Article,Negation words(not/no),Preposition,Quantifier,1st person singular pronoun,1st person plural pronoun,2nd person pronoun in conversation. Authors propose a novel probabilistic framework to prove their hypothesis.

Framework:

When individual talk about some topic, they would have to use similar words to describe topics hence it is important to remove topic accommodation from overall accommodation measure. Since they LIWC dimensions, it is automatically removed.

Their framework is based on mainly two components, stylistic cohesion and stylistic accommodation.

Stylstic Cohesion: It is used to find if tweets belonging to same conversation exhibit a certain LIWC style more than tweets which are unrelated. If the former is more then we can say that tweets which are part of same conversation agree more on a particular style. Formally, for a style it is defined as:

where is condition which represent that tweets represent a conversation turn.