Difference between revisions of "Gimpel and Smith, NAACL 2010"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Softmax-Margin CRFs: Training Log-Linear Models with Cost Functions''' | '''Softmax-Margin CRFs: Training Log-Linear Models with Cost Functions''' | ||
− | This [[Category:Paper|paper]] can be found at: [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kgimpel/papers/gimpel+smith.naacl10.pdf] | + | This [[Category::Paper|paper]] can be found at: [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kgimpel/papers/gimpel+smith.naacl10.pdf] |
==Citation== | ==Citation== |
Revision as of 17:57, 25 September 2011
Softmax-Margin CRFs: Training Log-Linear Models with Cost Functions
This paper can be found at: [1]
Contents
Citation
Kevin Gimpel and Noah A. Smith. Softmax-margin CRFs: Training log-linear models with loss functions. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technologies Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 733-736, Los Angeles, California, USA, June 2010.
Summary
The authors want to be able to incorporate a cost function (present in structured SVMs) into standard conditional log-likelihood models. They introduce the softmax-margin objective function that achieves the best of both worlds. Using a NER task, it performs significantly better than a standard conditional loglikelihood model, a max-margin model, and the perceptron, but is indistinguishable from MIRA, risk, and JRB (Jensen risk bound; defined in the paper).
Brief Description of the Softmax-Margin objective function
Consider the objective functions for these four methods. Our
Conditional log likelihood:
Max-margin:
Risk:
Softmax-margin: