Difference between revisions of "Minimum error rate training"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
When training a model, often times it is beneficial to take into account the actual evaluation method for that model. In many cases, training methods do not. MERT attempts to train models for [[AddressesProblem::Machine Translation|statistical machine translation]]. It attempts to optimize the parameters of the model while considering a more complex evaluation method than simply counting incorrect translations. It essentially attempts to train the model based on the method that will be used to evaluate the model. | When training a model, often times it is beneficial to take into account the actual evaluation method for that model. In many cases, training methods do not. MERT attempts to train models for [[AddressesProblem::Machine Translation|statistical machine translation]]. It attempts to optimize the parameters of the model while considering a more complex evaluation method than simply counting incorrect translations. It essentially attempts to train the model based on the method that will be used to evaluate the model. | ||
− | == | + | == Optimization Problem == |
The goal of MERT, as the name would suggest, is to find a minimum error rate count, given: | The goal of MERT, as the name would suggest, is to find a minimum error rate count, given: | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<math>\hat{e}(f_s;\lambda_1^M) = \underset{e \in C}{\operatorname{argmax}}\{\sum_{m=1}^{M} \lambda_{m}h_m(e|f_s)\}</math> | <math>\hat{e}(f_s;\lambda_1^M) = \underset{e \in C}{\operatorname{argmax}}\{\sum_{m=1}^{M} \lambda_{m}h_m(e|f_s)\}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The error count is provided by: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\hat{\lambda}_1^M = \underset{\lambda_1^M}{\operatorname{argmin}}\{\sum_{s=1}^S E(r_s,\hat{e}(f_s;\lambda_1^m))\}</math> | ||
+ | <math>= \underset{\lambda_1^M}{\operatorname{argmin}}\{\sum_{s=1}^S \sum_{k=1}^K E(r_s,e_{s,k})\delta(\hat{e}(f_s;\lambda_1^M),e_{s,k})\}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Drawbacks == | ||
+ | |||
+ | MERT, while very powerful (and the current popular approach to training MT models), has some drawbacks | ||
+ | * Tends to overfit | ||
+ | * Doesn't work well with large feature sets | ||
+ | * High variance across runs due to many local optima |
Revision as of 12:18, 13 November 2011
Minimum error rate training (or MERT) is a method. This is a work in progress by Francis Keith
Citation
MERT was originally proposed in the paper “Minimum Error Rate Training in Statistical Machine Translation”, Franz Josef Och, ACL, 2003, pp. 160-167. (found here [1])
Background
When training a model, often times it is beneficial to take into account the actual evaluation method for that model. In many cases, training methods do not. MERT attempts to train models for statistical machine translation. It attempts to optimize the parameters of the model while considering a more complex evaluation method than simply counting incorrect translations. It essentially attempts to train the model based on the method that will be used to evaluate the model.
Optimization Problem
The goal of MERT, as the name would suggest, is to find a minimum error rate count, given:
- , the representative corpus
- , the reference translations
- , a set of candidate translations
- for each
- feature functions
- model parameters
We then attempt to optimize:
The error count is provided by:
Drawbacks
MERT, while very powerful (and the current popular approach to training MT models), has some drawbacks
- Tends to overfit
- Doesn't work well with large feature sets
- High variance across runs due to many local optima