Difference between revisions of "Posterior Regularization for Expectation Maximization"

From Cohen Courses
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
== Method Description ==
 
== Method Description ==
For a given set x of observed data, a set of latent data z and a set of parameters <math>\theta</math>, the [[Expectation Maximization]] algorithm can be viewed as the alternation between two maximization steps of the function <math>F(q,\theta)</math>.
+
For a given set <math>x\in X</math> of observed data, a set of latent data <math>z\in Z</math> and a set of parameters <math>\theta</math>, the [[Expectation Maximization]] algorithm can be viewed as the alternation between two maximization steps of the function <math>F(q,\theta)</math>, by marginalizing different free variables.
  
 
The E-step is defined as:
 
The E-step is defined as:
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
<math>
 
<math>
\theta^{t+1} =  
+
\theta^{t+1} = argmax_{\theta} F(q^{t+1},\theta) = argmax_{\theta} log L(\theta|x) =  
 
</math>
 
</math>

Revision as of 18:35, 29 September 2011

Summary

This is a method to impose contraints on posteriors in the Expectation Maximization algorithm, allowing a finer-level control over these posteriors.

Method Description

For a given set of observed data, a set of latent data and a set of parameters , the Expectation Maximization algorithm can be viewed as the alternation between two maximization steps of the function , by marginalizing different free variables.

The E-step is defined as:

where is the Kullback-Leibler divergence given by

The M-step is defined as: